The primary intention of Journal of Negative Results is to provide an online-medium for the publication of peer-reviewed, sound scientific work in ecology and evolutionary biology that may otherwise remain unknown. In recent years, the trend has been to publish only studies with 'significant' results and to ignore studies that seem uneventful. This may lead to a biased, perhaps untrue, representation of what exists in nature. By counter-balancing such selective reporting, JNR aims to expand the capacity for formulating generalizations. The work to be published in JNR will include studies that 1) test novel or established hypotheses/theories that yield negative or dissenting results, or 2) replicate work published previously (in either cognate or different systems). Short notes on studies in which the data are biologically interesting but lack statistical power are also welcome. JNR also intends to present the results of studies in a format suitable for formal meta-analysis. Research quality is of highest importance for JNR. Manuscripts will be assessed for publication on this basis - positive results or support for current scientific dogma are not essential.
'to do science is to search for repeated patterns' (MacArthur, 1972)
To advertise JNR at your institute, download this advert pdf (55k) or this leaflet pdf (176k)
Call for submissions.
Prospective Author: the Journal of Negative Results is now calling for submissions. Please follow the links below for instructions on how to prepare and submit your manuscripts electronically (click HERE to submit Online).
Vol 5, No 1 (2008):
Table of Contents
Articles
| Failure to find the relationship between dispersal and spatial autocorrelation in species abundance | Abstract PDF |
| Volker Bahn |
| Testing the reliability of pellet counts as an estimator of small rodent relative abundance in mature boreal forest | Abstract PDF |
| Martin-Hugues St-Laurent, Jean Ferron |
Journal of Negative Results. ISSN: 1459-4625